Evaluating Species Distribution Models (SDMs) for Efficient and Accurate Detection of Wild Species Across Landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/jbioua.13.01.36-42.2025Keywords:
Species Distribution Models, Environmental Niche Modeling, Species Detection, Biodiversity Monitoring, Maxent Modeling, Field Survey EfficiencyAbstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) have been used across continents and taxonomic groups to guide field surveys and improve detection efficiency. In several studies, SDM-guided approaches achieved Area Under the Curve values between 0.90 and 0.976, with some reports documenting the discovery of new populations (e.g., 4 of 8 species or 5-16 additional sites) and time savings of up to 70% compared with unsystematic surveys. One study noted that Gaussian Process models operated 70 times faster than an alternative estimation method. Additional work indicates that SDMs narrow survey areas and enhance cost effectiveness, particularly when environmental layers and robust occurrence data support model development. These studies show that, when applied with methods such as Maxent and ensemble approaches, SDMs offer a viable alternative to direct field surveys for locating wild species over large areas. Limitations arise when data quality or model specification is insufficient, suggesting that careful design remains essential for reliable outcomes.
References
Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Carvalheiro LG, Polce C, van Loon EE, Raes N, et al. (2013). Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria – Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study. PLOS ONE, 8(5), e63708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063708
Braunisch V, Suchant R. (2010). Predicting species distributions based on incomplete survey data: the trade-off between precision and scale. Ecography, 33, 826–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05891.x
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JMC, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Elith J, Leathwick JR. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697.
Eyre AC, Briscoe NJ, Harley DKP, Lumsden LF, McComb LB, Lentini PE. (2022). Using species distribution models and decision tools to direct surveys and identify potential translocation sites for a critically endangered species. Diversity and Distributions, 28, 700–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13469
Franklin J. (2010). Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golding N, Purse BV. (2016). Fast and flexible Bayesian species distribution modelling using Gaussian processes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12523
Guisan A, Broennimann O, Engler R, Vust M, Yoccoz NG, Lehmann A, Zimmermann NE. (2006). Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conservation Biology, 20(2), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00354.x
Guisan A, Thuiller W, Zimmermann NE. (2017). Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harapan TS, Nurainas, Syamsuardi, Taufiq A. (2022). Identifying the potential geographic distribution for Castanopsis argentea and Castanopsis tungurrut (Fagaceae) in the Sumatra Conservation Area Network, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 23(4), 1726–1733. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230402
Margules C, Pressey R. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243–253.
McCune JL. (2016). Species distribution models predict rare species occurrences despite significant effects of landscape context. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 1871–1879. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12702
Tessarolo G, Rangel TF, Araújo MB, Hortal J. (2014). Uncertainty associated with survey design in species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 20, 1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12236
Taufiq A, Fujiwara T, Murakami N. (2024). Comparative phylogeographic analysis and environmental suitability of four native tree species in Sundaland. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica, 75(3), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.18942/apg.202410
Rhoden CM, Peterman WE, Taylor CA. (2017). Maxent-directed field surveys identify new populations of narrowly endemic habitat specialists. PeerJ, 5, e3632. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3632
Wauchope-Drumm M, Bentley J, Beaumont LJ, Baumgartner JB, Nipperess DA. (2020). Using a species distribution model to guide NSW surveys of the long-footed potoroo (Potorous longipes). Austral Ecology, 45, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12804
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Biologi UNAND
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Jurnal Biologi Universitas Andalas (JBioUA).
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JBioUA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JBioUA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and JBioUA on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
• Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
• The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
• The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
• The right to self-archive the article,
• the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Jurnal Biologi Universitas Andalas).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, they warrant that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by JBioUA or its sublicensee.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
However, due to the advancement and availability of hacking and data mining techniques found over the Internet, JBioUA will not be able to guarantee that other parties will not mine our users' email addresses in any possible ways found over the Internet.
